I have seen many mentors taking trading classes these days. Many of them attract you by sharing their profit and loss statement, some by saying they have 10 to 15 years of experience in this field. In the same way, some people join the course to learn some strategies, to know some of the elements which can be helpful in their future analysis. And some people learn trading because of to learn how to trade without taking anyone help. Do you really need to learn all the things to become a trader? And what quality should we keep focused on before joining the course or selecting a mentor?
A mentor should be :-
When you choose a mentor, you should focus on his experience rather than looking at his profits. If the profits are attracting you, then you should know the reason behind it. you should know How much is the investment he has, how much is their profit percentage on investment, And how much risk did he take for this ? etc. Everyone’s phycology is different, that’s why you should select a mentor by looking at the process of training not by looking at the result. If you are selecting Mentor, for his experience, then you have to see whether all of them are going to work for you or not. It turns out that the mentor has given the experience of commodities, and you have joined their course for option trading.
Investment Unblocked gives you accurate and complete information about your course and the proses of covering all chapters. There are some theory classes that will give you complete knowledge of the market blueprint. And there are some practical case studies that will clear you the doubts of live trading. During trading, we share some stocks to learn all the tools you study.
Focus on learning :-
What should be the content of the course? It is a very important thing when you going to learn a new skill. If I join any art class then its content should be something like, How to draw an art by a pencil not How to Draw with Nataraj Pencil. I have seen some stock market training providers keep a chapter of moving average trading strategy. It’s a hoax. Moving average is an indicator, which should be covered during the indicator chapter. You are showing only the indicator as a chapter in your lesson, then you do not want to give full information or you do not even know all chapters. You know how to draw with a pencil, so what does it matter whether the pencil is of Nataraja or that of Apsara?
The Content Of Courses
What should be the content of the course? It is a very important thing when you going to learn a new skill. If I join any art class then its content should be something like, How to draw an art by a pencil not How to Draw with Nataraj Pencil. I have seen some stock market training providers keep a chapter of moving average trading strategy. It’s a hoax. Moving average is an indicator, which should be covered during the indicator chapter. You are showing only the indicator as a chapter in your lesson, then you do not want to give full information or you do not even know all chapters. You know how to draw with a pencil, so what does it matter whether the pencil is of Nataraja or that of Apsara?
Thank you sir for sharing valuable information .
Truely said
There should be a definite layout for courses
And yes courses dont make you trader
I think pshycology risk management and money management are more important
The same trade can be profitable to one and loss to one with same knowledge but different psychology
We neglect pshycology and risk management which should be an integral part of any trader course